This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- Flexera Community
- :
- AdminStudio
- :
- AdminStudio Forum
- :
- Tuner / Developer Validation Output not Same
Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Tuner / Developer Validation Output not Same
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This has happened several times to me. I can do a full MSI validatation of a transform in Tuner and get a certain number of errors reported, and if I validate the same transform in Developer, against the same cub file (as far as I know), I get a different number of errors. How can this happen?
Here's specifics, and please don't gasp at these numbers, they are real and from a vendor supplied MSI. If I run the Full MSI Validation on the original MSI I get 1102 errors. If I do Win2K validation, there are 1100 errors. Then I create my Transform. A full MSI Validation in Tuner comes up with 1101 errors, and the same Validation in Developer comes up with 1103. One of the errors found in Tuner was NOT found in Developer, but Developer found 3 errors Tuner didn't (1101 - 1 + 3 = 1103).
Any thoughts? Or has anyone else seen this? One of several quirks that I think are associated more with Tuner than anything else.
Here's specifics, and please don't gasp at these numbers, they are real and from a vendor supplied MSI. If I run the Full MSI Validation on the original MSI I get 1102 errors. If I do Win2K validation, there are 1100 errors. Then I create my Transform. A full MSI Validation in Tuner comes up with 1101 errors, and the same Validation in Developer comes up with 1103. One of the errors found in Tuner was NOT found in Developer, but Developer found 3 errors Tuner didn't (1101 - 1 + 3 = 1103).
Any thoughts? Or has anyone else seen this? One of several quirks that I think are associated more with Tuner than anything else.
‎Jun 04, 2003 10:00 AM
(7) Replies
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Which version of AdminStudio are you using? Are you using Developer as it came in AdminStudio, or a different version?
‎Jun 04, 2003 02:34 PM
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
AdminStudio is v5.1. When I installed AdminStudio, I had no previous components on my system, so Tuner, Developer, etc. were all installed as part of the AdminStudio installation. I have applied the service packs to Developer, and am currently running v8.01.
‎Jun 05, 2003 09:49 AM
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Just a couple of question more -
1) In Tuner, you can turn off the output display of error, warning, and/or information messages (you can't in Developer). Are any of the message types turned off in Tuner?
2) Have you tried the validation with Orca? How do the results compare?
I really want to get to the bottom of this...
1) In Tuner, you can turn off the output display of error, warning, and/or information messages (you can't in Developer). Are any of the message types turned off in Tuner?
2) Have you tried the validation with Orca? How do the results compare?
I really want to get to the bottom of this...
‎Jun 06, 2003 11:01 AM
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm only omitting Info results in Tuner.
I just ran validation on my transform. ORCA and Tuner give identical results, with regards to errors. ORCA gave me two extra warnings (ICE33) that Tuner did not. Developer was the odd one. The extra errors reported were:
ICE39 Error PID_REVNUMBER value in Summary Information Stream is not valid. Format for Transforms is " ; ;".
ICE39 Error PID_TEMPLATE value in Summary Information Stream is not valid. It must be of the form "Platform,Platform,...;LangID,LangID,...".
ICE39 Error PID_TEMPLATE value in Summary Information Stream is not valid. It must be of the form "Platform,Platform,...;LangID,LangID,...".
I've seen that on other transforms I've created too, and I can't fix it.
Thanks,
Rob
I just ran validation on my transform. ORCA and Tuner give identical results, with regards to errors. ORCA gave me two extra warnings (ICE33) that Tuner did not. Developer was the odd one. The extra errors reported were:
ICE39 Error PID_REVNUMBER value in Summary Information Stream is not valid. Format for Transforms is "
ICE39 Error PID_TEMPLATE value in Summary Information Stream is not valid. It must be of the form "Platform,Platform,...;LangID,LangID,...".
ICE39 Error PID_TEMPLATE value in Summary Information Stream is not valid. It must be of the form "Platform,Platform,...;LangID,LangID,...".
I've seen that on other transforms I've created too, and I can't fix it.
Thanks,
Rob
‎Jun 11, 2003 09:56 AM
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
In Program Files\InstallShield\AdminStudio\5.0, please send me the darice.cub files from Developer\Support and Tuner\Support. Lets take this off-line and get it resolved. You can e-mail me at nank@installshield.com
‎Jun 12, 2003 09:28 AM
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
has anyone resolved ice39?
why are these extra errors coming up with dev studio?(and not with tuner)
why are these extra errors coming up with dev studio?(and not with tuner)
‎Apr 21, 2005 05:50 AM
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi ,
Even I am facing the same problem . I faced this problem while packaging Office 2003 .
I get only ICE25 in tuner but dev studio gives 3 extra ICE39 warnings .
ICE39 Error PID_TEMPLATE value in Summary Information Stream is not valid. It must be of the form "Platform,Platform,...;LangID,LangID,...". http://dartools/iceman/ice39.html _SummaryInfo 7
Please let me know if someone has cracked this issue .
Cheers ,
V
Even I am facing the same problem . I faced this problem while packaging Office 2003 .
I get only ICE25 in tuner but dev studio gives 3 extra ICE39 warnings .
ICE39 Error PID_TEMPLATE value in Summary Information Stream is not valid. It must be of the form "Platform,Platform,...;LangID,LangID,...". http://dartools/iceman/ice39.html _SummaryInfo 7
Please let me know if someone has cracked this issue .
Cheers ,
V
‎Apr 21, 2005 06:54 AM
Related Content
