A new Flexera Community experience is coming on November 25th. Click here for more information.
Hi All,
Just wondering how everyone else is handling the registration of multiple components for a product within the FDP Private Catalog? I am finding it is one to one between product and component and therefore in the below example I have to create multiple products so that I can have multiple components.... anyone else in this boat or are we going too detailed with the mapping?
This is what i have to do... which kind of makes the component field superfluous to need as I am having to include it in the Product Name field which is then selected in the Software field name.
Manufacturer | Family | Product | Component | Software | Market Version | Version | PKG Name |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software Admin | Admin | Software Admin | 1 | 1.0.1 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Admin.1.0.1 |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software Driver | Driver | Software Driver | 1 | 1.1.2 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Driver.1.1.2 |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software Finaliser | Finaliser | Software Finaliser | 1 | 1.1.2 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Finaliser.1.1.2 |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software Processor | Processor | Software Processor | 1 | 1.0.1 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Processor.1.0.1 |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software Extractor | Extractor | Software Extractor | 2 | 2.2.2 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Extractor.2.2.2 |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software Updater | Updater | Software Updater | 2 | 2.0.1 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Updater.2.0.1 |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software Matcher | Matcher | Software Matcher | 3 | 3.0.0 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Matcher.3.0.0 |
This is what I thought I could do... or am I completely barking up the wrong tree and have assumed the wrong definition of component and/or are using the private catalogue incorrectly? Can someone also tell me why release is mandatory in the private catalogue but contains the same info as the software market/version field?
Manufacturer | Family | Product | Component | Software | Market Version | Version | PKG Name |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software | Admin | Software | 1 | 1.0.1 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Admin.1.0.1 |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software | Driver | Software | 1 | 1.1.2 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Driver.1.1.2 |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software | Finaliser | Software | 1 | 1.1.2 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Finaliser.1.1.2 |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software | Processor | Software | 1 | 1.0.1 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Processor.1.0.1 |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software | Extractor | Software | 2 | 2.2.2 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Extractor.2.2.2 |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software | Updater | Software | 2 | 2.0.1 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Updater.2.0.1 |
Acme Corporation | Software Family | Software | Matcher | Software | 3 | 3.0.0 | Acme.SoftwareFamily.Matcher.3.0.0 |
‎Feb 07, 2022 09:13 PM
Anybody else using the private catalogue or just us?
‎Mar 09, 2022 12:43 AM
In Technopedia, component is just a metadata of a product. There's no established relationship between a product and multiple components. Therefore, when you need to create multiple components of the same product, you're going to need to create a brand new product for each component. This behavior is not just in private catalog, but also in "public" catalog. This is something that we planned on improving in Flexera One Technopedia.
As for why a release is required, a release is a combo of product + version + (optionally) edition. When you pick a product with no edition, product + version becomes release (i.e., release will be identical with version). However, when you pick a product with editions, then product + version + edition will be different from product + version. That's why the granularity is needed at the release level.
Hope that helps.
Let me know if you have any further questions.
- Resno
‎Mar 09, 2022 05:51 PM