Some users may be experiencing issues when trying to access customer resources like the Case Portal or the Product Licensing Center. Our team is aware of the issue and is working to resolve it. Click here for more information.
for this license according to the Microsoft metric the consumption should be calculated taking as reference all the cores of the Hosts inside a Custer vmware. E.G if the Cluster is made up of 6 hosts but only one Microsoft virtual machine is hosted on one of the 6 Hosts, the license consumption should be calculated for all cores of the 6 Hosts and not only on the host that hosts the Microsoft virtual machine. I applied the "Microsoft Server / Management Core" type to the license and the consumption it detects is only on the host hosting the microsoft virtual machine. Is it possible to consider this a bug of the platform or is it necessary to perform some particular configuration?
Thank you
Claudio
Feb 24, 2022 12:47 PM
Hello Claudio,
You are right, currently, the FNMS license computes Windows Server consumptions based on the last state of the Clusters / Hosts / Installed Windows Server VMs... Which is not good.
The rule however is more complicated than "you need to cover all your ESX servers with Windows Server DataCenter" licenses .
Here is a summary of the licensing rule from a "SAM Best Practices Monthly Webinar" session delivered in September 2021 (https://community.flexera.com/t5/Events-and-Webinars/Recording-and-Presentation-of-the-September-Monthly-SAM-Best/ba-p/206505/jump-to/first-unread-message)
Microsoft Server Operating System’s Licensing is challenging
Microsoft does not require all cores of all Hosts within clusters to be licensed... they have a mobility rule hat leads their customer to choose the "worst" case... or even the "All ESX Servers in DataCenter" options that are extremely expensive. The report com
Another session delivered on February 3rd https://community.flexera.com/t5/Events-and-Webinars/Recording-and-Presentation-of-the-February-Monthly-SAM-Best/bc-p/225402#M124 give details on the Windows Server optimization report that will be released in March. The licenses will not perform the same calculations short term but allocations will be possible (flat Windows Server License consumption report in April)... and this optimization logic will be added mid term to the licenses.
You can subscribe to to "event and Webinar" section of the community to monitor other Best Practices sessions: https://community.flexera.com/t5/Events-and-Webinars/bg-p/learning-labs
Best regards,
Nicolas
B
Feb 28, 2022 06:57 AM
Please elaborate a bit more on your "best practice" question. As per Nicolas' response above and the available videos where he goes through the various scenarios in details I would say it's the higher density of VMs in the cluster that will help you allocate the appropriate Datacenter licenses as the "cheapest" option. However, this answer may not be aligned to your question?
Thanks,
Nov 11, 2024 12:22 AM
Hello Claudio,
You are right, currently, the FNMS license computes Windows Server consumptions based on the last state of the Clusters / Hosts / Installed Windows Server VMs... Which is not good.
The rule however is more complicated than "you need to cover all your ESX servers with Windows Server DataCenter" licenses .
Here is a summary of the licensing rule from a "SAM Best Practices Monthly Webinar" session delivered in September 2021 (https://community.flexera.com/t5/Events-and-Webinars/Recording-and-Presentation-of-the-September-Monthly-SAM-Best/ba-p/206505/jump-to/first-unread-message)
Microsoft Server Operating System’s Licensing is challenging
Microsoft does not require all cores of all Hosts within clusters to be licensed... they have a mobility rule hat leads their customer to choose the "worst" case... or even the "All ESX Servers in DataCenter" options that are extremely expensive. The report com
Another session delivered on February 3rd https://community.flexera.com/t5/Events-and-Webinars/Recording-and-Presentation-of-the-February-Monthly-SAM-Best/bc-p/225402#M124 give details on the Windows Server optimization report that will be released in March. The licenses will not perform the same calculations short term but allocations will be possible (flat Windows Server License consumption report in April)... and this optimization logic will be added mid term to the licenses.
You can subscribe to to "event and Webinar" section of the community to monitor other Best Practices sessions: https://community.flexera.com/t5/Events-and-Webinars/bg-p/learning-labs
Best regards,
Nicolas
B
Feb 28, 2022 06:57 AM
Hi,
Is there a current Best Practice for Licensing a Cluster with MS Server Datacenter Licenses please. Currently I can see Flexera looking to cover all Virtual Cores , so I have a deficit. Should I just 'fudge' the entitlement to cover the max consumprion ? Thank you
Nov 04, 2024 06:48 AM - edited Nov 04, 2024 06:48 AM
Please elaborate a bit more on your "best practice" question. As per Nicolas' response above and the available videos where he goes through the various scenarios in details I would say it's the higher density of VMs in the cluster that will help you allocate the appropriate Datacenter licenses as the "cheapest" option. However, this answer may not be aligned to your question?
Thanks,
Nov 11, 2024 12:22 AM
With the benefit of everybody's superior knowledge I am thinking that we haven't calculated our requirements properly . Would you all agree that an HCI Node with 2 sockets and 48 cores would need Qty 3 x WinSvrDCCore 2019 SNGL MVL 16Lic CoreLic(enses) ? Thank you all...........
Nov 11, 2024 03:51 PM