Feb 16, 2023
02:50 AM
Hi,
This should be obvious, but I need consolidation.
In FNMS database "SoftwareRecognitionID" equals FlexeraID "MGS-APP-00000000001" and it is bound to SoftwareTitleID "-281".
I assume the following:
- FlexeraID is immutable and will not change (only in some very spesific ARL changes at most?)
- SoftwareTitleID can change, for example first it is boud to application "xyz v4.1" but after changes the ARL is changed and its bound to "xyz v4" to clarifiy the versioning. The old application ID is then erased and replaced with new one?
- "LastRecordUpdated": "according to schema reference: If Last updated datetime by ARL on the software title or evidence records. To know which record this column refers to, see TypeOfID." So in case the softwaretitleID is updated this would show that, but not - assuming Flexera ID is not immutable - the date Flera ID has changed?
... View more
Feb 15, 2023
10:06 AM
Hi,
Can you please elaborate what "Fixed “is_deleted” functionality" contains in detail? Is it related to IsDeleted for application tables or inventor or both? We have been having some isDeleted issues with applications with the previous application version, so more technical details on this would be appreciated.
BR, Antti
... View more
Dec 23, 2022
05:08 AM
Hi @VishalN the problem is to inject the complianceComputerID in the first place since it will not have anything to match to, eg. you would have to use serialno, name etc parameters to match. IF that route is taken, I noticed custom fields in inventory device cannot be directly used for matching. Instead I found that works is some other built-infield, eg. Chassisnumber that can be then be used to "smuggle" the compliancecomputerid to devices. The Chassisnumber is not visible for VMs but will anyway be saved and can be then used for matching. But again, the original problem remains - how to match the existinging/new devices exactly since complianceComputerID is not injected for those.
If you use assets you can use custom field with complianceComputerID for matching, but there is problem that Assets in turn are matched with serialnumber to inventory devices, making a mess in cases where devices have identical serialnumber and then the AssetID is matched from multiple devices to one device.
Please let us know if you find a workaround since this would be very valuable for the community as a whole.
BR, Antti
This is working if you create asset
... View more
Dec 16, 2022
01:07 AM
Hi, I am trying to match computers with a value in custom field (the custom field visible in Flexera Web UI as well).
Matching with built-in fields such as computer name or serial number, but it fails with added custom fields, for example "Device notes" value "ERP staging database"
However, BAS always gets error like:
12/16/2022 9:02:37 AM - Warning - Marking Existing Records The multi-part identifier "compliancecomputer.ComplianceComputerTypeID" could not be bound. The multi-part identifier "compliancecomputer.compliancecomputerid" could not be bound.
Is this table restriction since custom field is not foreign or primary key?
Has anyone gotten this to work?
... View more
Dec 08, 2022
12:17 PM
@johnksilverwood I've rested just to confirm and still got the same error. The only solution seemed to be is having reports in the root folder.
... View more
Dec 08, 2022
11:54 AM
Hi, @johnksilverwood
I am not sure if this is related, but from my experience the reports need to reside in root folder of reports (not in any custom/built-in subfolders), otherwise the report cannot be found via the API. When they are in root Reports folder the URL is following:
https://slo.app.flexera.eu/Suite/Reports/View/<reportID>
If reports are in subfolders the URL is following:
https://slo.app.flexera.eu/Suite/Reports/<reportname>?_reportId=<reportID>
If they are in subfolders the URL is as follows I get the same type of error:
Invoke-WebRequest: {"name":"not_found","id":"jfc7ghBZ","message":"Cannot run the report execute the report once in the UI","temporary":false,"timeout":false,"fault":false}
@nrousseau1 maybe there is some way to circumnvent this?
@Nichrt
... View more
Nov 24, 2022
04:16 AM
1 Kudo
Hi, is it possible to match devices based on ComplianceComputerID (the legacy method) in Flexera One when updating Computer records. This works on-prem instead despite it not being the recommended method.
In System Task - Business import I get the error. I just want to confirm this is the case:
"Import failed. Error: Property type 'compliancecomputerid' is not supported in object type 'Computer'."
... View more
Nov 23, 2022
07:28 AM
2 Kudos
At the first glance Oracle consumption is back to normal after applying the ARL .cab file. Many thanks @shuduguru! & team!
... View more
Nov 22, 2022
04:08 AM
2 Kudos
Hi, these changed over the last weekend and was detected on monday when ARL/PURL was applied and reporting was due on Oracle & MS. I will create a ticket.
BR, Antti
... View more
Nov 22, 2022
03:11 AM
5 Kudos
After updating to this ARL on 2021 R1 on-prem we've had problems with Oracle Partitioning, Advanced Security and Database In-Memory are showing weird values.
EDIT: removed comment on SQL Server 2016/2019 detecting as application without edition information as it is not related to this ARL/PURL, rather an earlier change. Seems that there is overlapping evidence that was the cause that can be avoided setting them to ignore.
Is this know issue?
... View more
Oct 24, 2022
04:31 AM
Hi guys,
Do you know any method to gather installaer evidence via XenApp Agent for non-AppV applications? These applications from "Master Image" source do not record data for installer MSI (eg. what you see in registry/programs & features menu) and can only record the executable information. Some cases the applications are stated using .PS1 or .CMD scripts so not even .exe level version information is available for those. The desire would be to avoid manual mapping of .exe applications as evidence and matching them to what is installed on workers/delivery controllers.
... View more
Sep 19, 2022
02:17 AM
2 Kudos
Hi,
Just in case if anyone out there is pondering about mutual authentication of agents and Beacon over the Internet, on Azure the best solution in my opinion is to use Application Gateway (v2) instead of IIS. Exposing a VM to Internet using IIS-configured certificate authentication is available, but likely not the most secure method. App GW v2 allows certificate authentication via SSL Policies at the front end as well as in the back end if required along with end-to-end TLS. Once App GW v2 and certificates are set up, beaconengine.config needs to be configured to use the app GW public DNS name instead of beacon hostname. Naturally certificate revocation checks need to be disabled on agents when using self-signed certificates.
Note that self-signed certificates do not work at the back end of App GW v2 (or at least I could not make them work without the 502 error) but you can do http at the back end without problems as https is already used at the front end. With trusted certificate https should work at the back end as well.
See the attachment for simplified configration diagram.
... View more
Sep 19, 2022
01:57 AM
1 Kudo
Hi, @dbeckner I was given a hotfix by support with changes made to ComplianceReader.exe.config. As it is not publicized fix yet to my knowledge, please create support case and refer to case #02533477.
BR, Antti
... View more
Jan 04, 2022
11:21 AM
Hi @JulesB did you have any conclusion to the case? I've tried everything from editing the web.config files and installing all prereqs all over again. Still it refuses to work on all app servers where beacon is installed, only on remote beacon it works. BR, Antti
... View more
Dec 20, 2021
08:18 AM
8 Kudos
Hi, I apparently found the reason for the mgscmn.dll crash. "IncludeFile" registry key in 2019 R2 agent registry cannot include double wildcard: *log4j* In 2021 R1 agent this works, but 2019 R2 agent causes mgscmn.dll/ndtrack.exe to fail. BR, Antti
... View more
Latest posts by anttimustonen
Subject | Views | Posted |
---|---|---|
175 | Feb 16, 2023 02:50 AM | |
171 | Feb 15, 2023 10:06 AM | |
454 | Dec 23, 2022 05:08 AM | |
648 | Dec 16, 2022 01:07 AM | |
1328 | Dec 08, 2022 12:17 PM | |
1347 | Dec 08, 2022 11:54 AM | |
429 | Nov 24, 2022 04:16 AM | |
614 | Nov 23, 2022 07:28 AM | |
852 | Nov 22, 2022 04:08 AM | |
879 | Nov 22, 2022 03:11 AM |
Activity Feed
- Kudoed Re: FlereraID vs. Application ID changes for Big_Kev. Feb 27, 2023 02:12 AM
- Posted FlereraID vs. Application ID changes on FlexNet Manager Forum. Feb 16, 2023 02:50 AM
- Posted Re: ServiceNow Flexera Integration Scoped App version 5.1.0 is now Available in ServiceNow Store on FlexNet Manager Release Blog. Feb 15, 2023 10:06 AM
- Posted Re: Business Adapter matching inventory with a custom field on Flexera One Forum. Dec 23, 2022 05:08 AM
- Posted Business Adapter matching inventory with a custom field on Flexera One Forum. Dec 16, 2022 01:07 AM
- Kudoed The New Generic ITAM REST API for querying any web report is available! A PowerShell example. for nrousseau1. Dec 09, 2022 12:28 AM
- Posted Re: The New Generic ITAM REST API for querying any web report is available! A PowerShell example. on FlexNet Manager Knowledge Base. Dec 08, 2022 12:17 PM
- Posted Re: The New Generic ITAM REST API for querying any web report is available! A PowerShell example. on FlexNet Manager Knowledge Base. Dec 08, 2022 11:54 AM
- Kudoed Re: Business Adapter import using ComplianceComputerID matching for dbeckner. Nov 28, 2022 01:31 PM
- Got a Kudo for Business Adapter import using ComplianceComputerID matching. Nov 28, 2022 08:17 AM
- Kudoed Re: Business Adapter import using ComplianceComputerID matching for ChrisG. Nov 28, 2022 05:24 AM
- Got a Kudo for Re: FlexNet Manager Update: Application Recognition Library #2714 and Service Life Data Pack #561 are available. Nov 24, 2022 07:05 AM
- Posted Business Adapter import using ComplianceComputerID matching on Flexera One Forum. Nov 24, 2022 04:16 AM
- Got a Kudo for Re: FlexNet Manager Update: Application Recognition Library #2714 and Service Life Data Pack #561 are available. Nov 23, 2022 06:36 PM
- Posted Re: FlexNet Manager Update: Application Recognition Library #2714 and Service Life Data Pack #561 are available on FlexNet Manager Content Blog. Nov 23, 2022 07:28 AM
- Kudoed Re: FlexNet Manager Update: Application Recognition Library #2714 and Service Life Data Pack #561 are available for shuduguru. Nov 23, 2022 07:27 AM
- Kudoed Re: FlexNet Manager Update: Application Recognition Library #2714 and Service Life Data Pack #561 are available for ChrisG. Nov 23, 2022 04:48 AM
- Got a Kudo for Re: FlexNet Manager Update: Application Recognition Library #2714 and Service Life Data Pack #561 are available. Nov 22, 2022 08:21 PM
- Got a Kudo for Re: FlexNet Manager Update: Application Recognition Library #2714 and Service Life Data Pack #561 are available. Nov 22, 2022 08:21 PM
- Kudoed Re: FlexNet Manager Update: Application Recognition Library #2714 and Service Life Data Pack #561 are available for chandan_kodgirw. Nov 22, 2022 07:25 AM