Aug 03, 2011
02:24 PM
Hmm, that's interesting. And you have definitely configured the install package to use the setup.exe launcher? You shouldn't have to apply any setting; it automatically displays that message when you use the setup launcher but leave the files uncompressed. If you search the string table for the message I quoted earlier (or just search for "setup.exe"), you will see where it is stored. If you have configured the installer to use setup.exe, and can still run the install via the msi, then I am at a loss. Maybe someone else out there has seen this. Could you in that case consider compressing everything into setup.exe?
... View more
Aug 01, 2011
04:57 PM
When the user double-clicks on the msi file, they don't see the message "This installation cannot be run by directly launching the MSI package. You must run setup.exe."? We've distributed a few basic MSI installs like this (using the setup.exe launcher but leaving the files uncompressed), and I haven't encountered this problem--the user sees the aforementioned message and can't proceed if they try to launch the install via the .msi file.
... View more
Jul 27, 2011
01:13 PM
Hi, That's precisely what I ended up doing. Thanks for your input! I just need to be kept in the loop when production distributes these patch versions. :rolleyes:
... View more
Jul 27, 2011
01:09 PM
I would put it after Cost Finalize in the UI sequence, but I often find myself playing around with sequencing my CAs because I haven't yet got a good grasp on it, so please take that suggestion with a pinch of salt. 😉 And again, disabling this constant may make not a difference on the Program Files folder. Let us know how it goes...
... View more
Jul 26, 2011
11:54 AM
Hi Tim, Using Disable(WOW64FSREDIRECTION) in an Installscript custom action might allow for this. The documentation mentions that this constant applies to the Windows system folder, but it may be worth a shot in this case, too.
... View more
Jul 25, 2011
01:41 PM
Has anyone run into this situation?
... View more
Jul 20, 2011
04:53 PM
I've created an Update.exe for one of my projects that works fine, except I've just learned that a patch of one of its files was sent to some customers between the previous release and the release that is covered by Update.exe. The upshot of that is my Update file doesn't realize it needs to overwrite that patched app with the latest version (it's looking for the previous release's version, after all), and so all of the latest and greatest are not installed. Aside from creating another Update.exe configuration that targets this patched app, how can I have my Update file upgrade any file with an older date stamp/version? Thanks...
... View more
Labels
- Labels:
-
InstallShield 2011
Jun 27, 2011
01:47 PM
I'd love to see automatic "clean up" of an installation's locally cached msi during Remove and Major Upgrade. I've added a CA to take care of this during an uninstall, but in the case of performing major upgrades, these pile up. It's almost inevitable that some of our end users (or at least their system admins) are going to complain about this use of disk space.
... View more
Jun 14, 2011
05:58 PM
For the custom action, defining "Not Installed" for the Condition explicitly states that the CA is to execute only during a first-time install. That should resolve your issue...
... View more
Jun 03, 2011
01:22 PM
Hi Tim, Absolutely, I'll let you know if I learn anything new on this. Thanks for your response...
... View more
Jun 02, 2011
01:40 PM
Hello, is there any update as to whether patches can be chained? I have a situation similar to Tim's: we would like to distribute a service pack as one tidy Update.exe file rather than multiple Update.exes for each installation. Thanks for any help.
... View more
May 20, 2011
12:18 PM
Well, the user can alter INSTALLDIR during the first-time installation, and though the default setting is the x64 Program Files directory, someone decided to install under PF (x86), leading to this. But yes, henceforth, installing under (x86) will not be permitted.
... View more
May 12, 2011
06:53 PM
Hi Snip, Yes, I am including some system DLLs with this install. It's for backwards compatibility for some old VB apps that are still included with this (Java) application. That aspect certainly needs a look-see. However, I disassociated these file components from the parent features, so that they did not install, and still the over-all application does not get removed. Oddly, if I pick a random component ID such as the following: Disallowing uninstallation of component: {8652057E-EB78-7955-3971-B8E632457783} since another client exists. and then search for that component GUID earlier in the log to see which file component that is, it does not exist. I have no idea what that component is. I am using dynamic file linking, which may have something to do with it. Thanks for your questions and observations.
... View more
May 11, 2011
01:09 PM
Hi, The components are not marked as permanent. I have attached the log file, thank you.
... View more
May 10, 2011
05:32 PM
Hi Vijay, thanks. Yes, and the INSTALLDIR has the correct value, i.e., C:\Program Files (x86)\ . I'm just not sure what the problem is.
... View more
Latest posts by Mescalero
Subject | Views | Posted |
---|---|---|
1129 | Aug 03, 2011 02:24 PM | |
1129 | Aug 01, 2011 04:57 PM | |
1286 | Jul 27, 2011 01:13 PM | |
1148 | Jul 27, 2011 01:09 PM | |
1148 | Jul 26, 2011 11:54 AM | |
1286 | Jul 25, 2011 01:41 PM | |
2975 | Jul 20, 2011 04:53 PM | |
1910 | Jun 27, 2011 01:47 PM | |
965 | Jun 14, 2011 05:58 PM | |
2041 | Jun 03, 2011 01:22 PM |
Activity Feed
- Posted Re: Separating .msi file from setup.exe in setup package. on InstallShield Forum. Aug 03, 2011 02:24 PM
- Posted Re: Separating .msi file from setup.exe in setup package. on InstallShield Forum. Aug 01, 2011 04:57 PM
- Posted Re: updating an "intermediate" version of a file during a patch on InstallShield Forum. Jul 27, 2011 01:13 PM
- Posted Re: How to Force ..\Program Files\.. Folder from 32 bit installer on InstallShield Forum. Jul 27, 2011 01:09 PM
- Posted Re: How to Force ..\Program Files\.. Folder from 32 bit installer on InstallShield Forum. Jul 26, 2011 11:54 AM
- Posted Re: updating an "intermediate" version of a file during a patch on InstallShield Forum. Jul 25, 2011 01:41 PM
- Posted updating an "intermediate" version of a file during a patch on InstallShield Forum. Jul 20, 2011 04:53 PM
- Posted Re: InstallShield 2012 wishlist on InstallShield Forum. Jun 27, 2011 01:47 PM
- Posted Re: Custom action running in uninstall but shoudl not on InstallShield Forum. Jun 14, 2011 05:58 PM
- Posted Re: Chained MSI, Temp location and MSP Patch on InstallShield Forum. Jun 03, 2011 01:22 PM
- Posted Re: Chained MSI, Temp location and MSP Patch on InstallShield Forum. Jun 02, 2011 01:40 PM
- Posted Re: files installed under Program Files (x86) are not uninstalled during Remove on InstallShield Forum. May 20, 2011 12:18 PM
- Posted Re: files installed under Program Files (x86) are not uninstalled during Remove on InstallShield Forum. May 12, 2011 06:53 PM
- Posted Re: files installed under Program Files (x86) are not uninstalled during Remove on InstallShield Forum. May 11, 2011 01:09 PM
- Posted Re: files installed under Program Files (x86) are not uninstalled during Remove on InstallShield Forum. May 10, 2011 05:32 PM
- Posted files installed under Program Files (x86) are not uninstalled during Remove on InstallShield Forum. May 09, 2011 05:43 PM
- Posted Re: Start > Programs menu shortcut icon not displaying for multi-instance on InstallShield Forum. Apr 27, 2011 11:22 AM
- Posted Start > Programs menu shortcut icon not displaying for multi-instance on InstallShield Forum. Apr 26, 2011 07:48 PM
- Posted Re: Problems resolving a property in a path on InstallShield Forum. Apr 19, 2011 05:07 PM
- Posted Problems resolving a property in a path on InstallShield Forum. Apr 12, 2011 11:33 AM