Flexera Installation Data Vs SCCM Data

[Yuvarajsekar]

Hello All,

When i am verify the data with the SCCM, Lot of difference in it. 

Flexera shows there is nothing installed for the given user, where SCCM shows that particular product has been installed. In confused state now. What to trust?

[mfranz]

Hi,

That screenshot seems not particularly helpful. Could you elaborate a bit what you have been comparing? Have you traced the evidences to understand the differences?

Best regards,

Markward

[statler]

Hi Yuvarajseka

Your screenshot shows the consumption for a license of type "User".

In FNMS, when looking at the consumption tab for a license of type "User", the "Installed" column the table shows the User name as well as Devices linked to the user. Multiple devices may potentially be assigned to each user which will lead to multiple rows for the same user name.

If your company is not working with androids only, you typically won't install software on a user. It is more common to install an application on devices that are assigned to a user.

Your screenshot shows no user that has any devices linked to it. Because no device is linked, the "Installed" column shows "no". However, the software license has been allocated to users directly, leading to one license being consumed per user. It looks as if the assignment of users to devices (or vice versa) did not work.

If you would like to see devices where a certain application has been detected, this will be easier from the "License Compliance > Applications > Installed Applications" view in the FNMS Web UI.