This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- Revenera Community
- :
- InstallShield
- :
- InstallShield Forum
- :
- Re: .NET project primary output is not updated upon upgrade
Subscribe
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Mar 25, 2008
09:28 AM
.NET project primary output is not updated upon upgrade
Hello,
I have a .NET project that has an assembly (.dll or .exe) file as an output installed by setup. When it is already installed and I do some modifications to the assembly and try to upgrade the application, this assembly is not updated in target location. Why?
I have a .NET project that has an assembly (.dll or .exe) file as an output installed by setup. When it is already installed and I do some modifications to the assembly and try to upgrade the application, this assembly is not updated in target location. Why?
(3) Replies
Not applicable
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Mar 25, 2008
09:50 AM
It's likely as a result of violating component rules.
I would start by verifying the situation here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2005/08/17/451516.aspx
I would start by verifying the situation here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/windows_installer_team/archive/2005/08/17/451516.aspx
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Mar 25, 2008
10:43 AM
Hello,
I have read the article. And I found the difference between the case described and mine.
In the article the component is listed as Advertised (and it is written that this is the main reason for the problem), while in my case it is listed as Absent upon first install and Reinstall upon upgrade (despite component that represents the assembly to install is listed as Local)...
I have read the article. And I found the difference between the case described and mine.
In the article the component is listed as Advertised (and it is written that this is the main reason for the problem), while in my case it is listed as Absent upon first install and Reinstall upon upgrade (despite component that represents the assembly to install is listed as Local)...
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Mar 25, 2008
11:42 AM
Those who come across this problem, refer to this thread.
The main idea is that IS uses file version while .NET is based on assembly version. To make it all work properly it is required to remove AssemblyFileVersion entry from AssemblyInfo.cs and make AssemblyVersion incremental (1.0.*). To make things easier one can create one AssemblyInfo.cs file and link it to all projects so that there is one place to change is needed.
The main idea is that IS uses file version while .NET is based on assembly version. To make it all work properly it is required to remove AssemblyFileVersion entry from AssemblyInfo.cs and make AssemblyVersion incremental (1.0.*). To make things easier one can create one AssemblyInfo.cs file and link it to all projects so that there is one place to change is needed.