- Revenera Community
- :
- FlexNet Publisher
- :
- FlexNet Publisher Forum
- :
- What is the difference between VENDOR and DAEMON lines in a license file?
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
I cannot find the syntax of the DAEMON line in the documentation files of the last few FlexNet Publisher versions. There are only short mentions related to lmutil lmlicvalidator command that is not enough. Is the DAEMON line the same as the VENDOR line?
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, the word "DAEMON" can be replaced with "VENDOR".
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @jjurica ,
Yes ,Vendor daemon is a single term . People often use them interchangeably. The syntax is as below
VENDOR vendor [vendor_daemon_path] [[OPTIONS=]options_file_path] [[PORT=]port]
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I am preparing now an Ansible role to manage all our company FlexLM license servers automatically. Does it mean that I can replace all DAEMON lines that were originally placed by license vendors with VENDOR lines without any worries?
I am sorry for the additional question but I need to be sure that our solution is good. 🙂
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @jjurica ,
Can you please let me know what changes you would like to do with the help of an example so that I can assist better
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Okay. We are a customer of several companies that use FlexLM for the license protection of their products. From time to time we need to replace old license files where we need to modify a few parts in the SERVER and VENDOR lines first. Here are two examples of the license files:
#
# Vendor's comments...
#
SERVER <server_name> xxxxxxxxxxxx <port_number>
VENDOR osslmgr <path_to_osslmgr>
USE_SERVER
#
# FEATURE section...
#
#
# Vendor's comments.
#
SERVER put_server_name_here xxxxxxxxxxxx 1717
DAEMON mgcld path_to_mgcld
#
# FEATURE section.
#
We change there the server name, server port and path to the vendor's binary. And because we run more and more license servers I am working on an automated way of (not only) replacing this information.
My question should be simple. Can I replace the line that starts with the word DAEMON in the second example with VENDOR or is there any significant difference between these two lines?
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, the word "DAEMON" can be replaced with "VENDOR".