This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- Revenera Community
- :
- InstallShield
- :
- InstallShield Forum
- :
- Re: .net framework 3.5 sp1
Subscribe
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Dec 15, 2008
04:00 PM
.net framework 3.5 sp1
The software that I am creating this install for requires the latest and greatest .net framework and it needs to be downloaded as we are distributing this install remotely and the .net packages is bigger then 200 mb. Right now I have it working through a .prq in a basic msi project. The problem is that when it goes to install it takes forever.(over an hour) And I am using a pretty typical buisness broadband connection for those of you wondering if I am attempting this over dial-up. Is there anything I can do to speed it up?
Secondly I am trying to have them wait to restart till the end of the install. I have the /noreboot tag in the prq file to keep from having to reboot after words. However, I still get a yes/no dialog box that asks me if I want to reboot. Yes will reboot and no will stop the install.
Any help would be appriciated
(Always impressed with the help on this forum)
Secondly I am trying to have them wait to restart till the end of the install. I have the /noreboot tag in the prq file to keep from having to reboot after words. However, I still get a yes/no dialog box that asks me if I want to reboot. Yes will reboot and no will stop the install.
Any help would be appriciated
(Always impressed with the help on this forum)
(11) Replies
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Dec 16, 2008
01:23 PM
If it helps i'm at 30+ minutes installing 3.5sp1 on a vista machine (and I had the installer on the local network so that's not even downloading it)... oh just finished this second, about 33 minutes. It's not a fast install by any means.
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Dec 16, 2008
01:46 PM
The 200+mb is more for media distributions. You want to use the internet bootstrapper download version that's 2mb initially then 60mbs deferred typically.
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Dec 16, 2008
02:48 PM
Forgive my newbness but can you provide the url for the prq file. Im not quite sure how to get my hands around it.
Thanks
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Dec 16, 2008
02:55 PM
Google ".net 3.5 sp1 installshield" and the first hit is:
http://kb.acresso.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalID=Q200284
http://kb.acresso.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalID=Q200284
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Dec 16, 2008
02:58 PM
Man I knew that was Newb question I should have known that 😞
Sorry for that but I really do appriciate the help. I hope I can return the favor one day.
Sorry for that but I really do appriciate the help. I hope I can return the favor one day.
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Feb 26, 2009
12:47 PM
Why is the InstallShield .NET 3.5 redistributable object 200 MB when the Microsoft .NET redistributable is only 2 or 3 MB? I don't want our users to have to have an internet connection to install, but I also don't want to add 200 MB to the install package. Is my only option then to add the Microsoft installer to my installation and run it using InstallScript functions?
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Feb 26, 2009
01:16 PM
cbarlow wrote:
I don't want our users to have to have an internet connection to install, but I also don't want to add 200 MB to the install package.
That's really the crux of the problem, right?
On my blog, I complained about the size of the framework and certain Microsoft employees claimed that I was exaggerating the size of the framework.
The reality is Microsoft only has two out of the box solutions
1) Super small bootstrapper with internet connectivity dependency
2) Super huge mondo package that can install everything on anything regardless of previous state.
If you want something in the middle, you have to make huge assumptions on what they already have and what hardware platforms they might be running. If you can do that, then you can extract the mondo and carve out the pieces you think you'll never need.
Or you can possibly use the new client profile pattern but that has serious issues.
Eitherway, the problem is with Microsoft here, not InstallShield.
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Feb 26, 2009
02:27 PM
So are you saying if I download the .NET 3.5 redistributable from Microsoft's website (2.7 MB) and install it with the rest of our program files, and then launch it using LaunchAppAndWait() that it still requires an internet connection?
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Aug 14, 2009
09:51 AM
I'm continuing to get the following message after the Microsfot .NET framework 3.5 SP1.prq file is run:
"The installation of the Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 appears to have failed. Do you want to continue the installation?" [Yes/No buttons]
I don't want this dialog to appear b/c I know that it is installing succesfully (i ran the framework install with the GUI and it said it did). How do I fix this so this dialog will not come up?
Thanks!
-jp
"The installation of the Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 appears to have failed. Do you want to continue the installation?" [Yes/No buttons]
I don't want this dialog to appear b/c I know that it is installing succesfully (i ran the framework install with the GUI and it said it did). How do I fix this so this dialog will not come up?
Thanks!
-jp
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Aug 17, 2009
04:25 AM
same problem here.:(