This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- Revenera Community
- :
- InstallShield
- :
- InstallShield Forum
- :
- Installed IS-2010 SP1; Converted project; Now Getting ICE27
Subscribe
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Oct 08, 2009
12:59 PM
Installed IS-2010 SP1; Converted project; Now Getting ICE27
I installed the SP1 update for IS2010, converted my earlier IS-2010 *.ism files, (0 errors/0 warnings). But now when I build my installations the Full MSI validation suite gives me a new error:
ISDEV : error ICE27: Unknown action: 'MsiConfigureServices' of InstallExecuteSequence table. Not a standard action and not found in CustomAction or Dialog tables | InstallExecuteSequence | Action MsiConfigureServices.
Any ideas on how resolve this ICE in a safe and efficient manner will be much appreciated.
ISDEV : error ICE27: Unknown action: 'MsiConfigureServices' of InstallExecuteSequence table. Not a standard action and not found in CustomAction or Dialog tables | InstallExecuteSequence | Action MsiConfigureServices.
Any ideas on how resolve this ICE in a safe and efficient manner will be much appreciated.
(2) Replies
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Oct 08, 2009
01:08 PM
This is a Microsoft issue as they forgot to update the ICE with this new standard action. You can uncheck this ICE so it is not run on validation or use the old cub files. You can also delete that action if you are not using the new MSI5 services functionality, but then you will have to add it whenever you do use it.
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Oct 08, 2009
01:17 PM
Thank you for the prompt reply.
My read on this is, in short - My setup is fine, but the test is bad?
My read on this is, in short - My setup is fine, but the test is bad?