This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- Revenera Community
- :
- InstallShield
- :
- InstallShield Forum
- :
- Re: InstallShield.msi.interop backwards compatible?
Subscribe
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
May 18, 2011
01:12 PM
InstallShield.msi.interop backwards compatible?
Hi,
I have a ManagedCustomAction dll that I created, that is referring to InstallShield.msi.interop from IS 2010.
I have been using it for a year, in an installation.
We have upgraded the version to IS2011.
I am wondering if I should rebuild my ManagedCustomAction dll, with a reference to InstallShield.msi.interop from IS 2011, or if InstallShield.msi.interop is backwards compatible. (in the IsClrWrap table of the installer, the link points to the IS2011 version of the interop dll, but the custom action dll was built with the IS2010 version).
Thanks for any help,
Claire
I have a ManagedCustomAction dll that I created, that is referring to InstallShield.msi.interop from IS 2010.
I have been using it for a year, in an installation.
We have upgraded the version to IS2011.
I am wondering if I should rebuild my ManagedCustomAction dll, with a reference to InstallShield.msi.interop from IS 2011, or if InstallShield.msi.interop is backwards compatible. (in the IsClrWrap table of the installer, the link points to the IS2011 version of the interop dll, but the custom action dll was built with the IS2010 version).
Thanks for any help,
Claire
(1) Reply
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
May 23, 2011
01:46 PM
While we haven't tested for backwards compatibility, I do not believe this DLL has changed materially either. I don't think you should have problems going with either version of the file, aside from possibly needing to recompile.