This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- Revenera Community
- :
- InstallAnywhere
- :
- InstallAnywhere Forum
- :
- setProgressPercentage()
Subscribe
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Mar 12, 2010
02:25 PM
setProgressPercentage()
Hello,
The problem: our IA project calls 8 sub-installers (which are themselves IA installers) during the install step. During the install, the progress bar jumps to about 95% after uninstaller was installed and then goes about running the 8 sub-installers. The sub-installers take substantially longer to run than the first "95%" of the installation.
Requirement: to have progress bar move more gradually.
Attempt: I've tried a simple text custom code to test setProgressPercentage() method. Here's a snippet.
But the progress bar stays at 95% as before. setProgressPercentage() seems to have no effect.
Could someone confirm this or may be suggest a solution?
Thank you in advance,
Alex
The problem: our IA project calls 8 sub-installers (which are themselves IA installers) during the install step. During the install, the progress bar jumps to about 95% after uninstaller was installed and then goes about running the 8 sub-installers. The sub-installers take substantially longer to run than the first "95%" of the installation.
Requirement: to have progress bar move more gradually.
Attempt: I've tried a simple text custom code to test setProgressPercentage() method. Here's a snippet.
public void install (InstallerProxy ip) throws InstallException {
try {
ip.setProgressPercentage (50); // also tried 0.5
Thread.sleep (10000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {}
}
But the progress bar stays at 95% as before. setProgressPercentage() seems to have no effect.
Could someone confirm this or may be suggest a solution?
Thank you in advance,
Alex
(1) Reply
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Mar 17, 2010
03:52 PM
Is this a known issue? I couldn't find anything on Google :S