This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- Revenera Community
- :
- InstallShield
- :
- InstallShield Forum
- :
- Using the BindImage table to improve application startup
Subscribe
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Jan 24, 2012
06:47 AM
Using the BindImage table to improve application startup
This rather old article describes the use of ordinal DLL binding to improve application startup time: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/bb985014.aspx
It mentions the Windows Installer's BindImage action, and its associated BindImage table.
It mentions the Windows Installer's BindImage action, and its associated BindImage table.
- Has anybody ever used this technique to improve application start up time?
- Any recommendation?
- Is it worth the effort at all?
(1) Reply
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Jan 25, 2012
03:44 PM
I'm not sure, but I believe this is largely considered overkill these days. It also conflicts with ASLR, and I believe in cases where the binding address and the actual address differ, the loading is even slower than the unbound case.