This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- Revenera Community
- :
- FlexNet Connect
- :
- FlexNet Connect Forum
- :
- Exact purpose of Update Manager
Subscribe
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Mar 03, 2005
08:55 AM
Exact purpose of Update Manager
I'm getting ready to release the next round of updates and I want to pull the Update Manager (i.e. set it in IS 10.5 to not include UM).
Before I pull UM, I want to be 100% certain of the purpose.
If my user does not have UM on their machine, will the agent still check for updates on the scheduled frequency, i.e. 30 days?
Is the UM only for viewing MESSAGES (and of course updates).
Is the only thing I lose by not using the UM is the ability to view MESSAGES? I understand I would have to write my own system to check for MESSAGES (not software updates) and then display them, somehow. And further, manage them so they don't get displayed twice.
Any feedback on what is lost by not using Update Manager is appreciated. I understand there is also some user control of update checking and periodicity, but that's not important, I set it in my install for a reason.
Thanks.
Before I pull UM, I want to be 100% certain of the purpose.
If my user does not have UM on their machine, will the agent still check for updates on the scheduled frequency, i.e. 30 days?
Is the UM only for viewing MESSAGES (and of course updates).
Is the only thing I lose by not using the UM is the ability to view MESSAGES? I understand I would have to write my own system to check for MESSAGES (not software updates) and then display them, somehow. And further, manage them so they don't get displayed twice.
Any feedback on what is lost by not using Update Manager is appreciated. I understand there is also some user control of update checking and periodicity, but that's not important, I set it in my install for a reason.
Thanks.
(3) Replies
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Mar 08, 2005
07:44 AM
Awaiting response please.
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Apr 06, 2005
09:56 AM
Neal, did you ever remove Update Manager from your installation? I'm thinking of doing the same thing. If you did remove it did you run into any problems or did you find any documentation on how to do it?
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Apr 06, 2005
10:00 AM
You better believe I removed it!!! Hate that thing! I have InstallShield 10.5 which provides an option in the Update Service area to not include UM, which is what I do. I'm looking forward to the 4.5 release with a much better UM. I think it can add great value if it's not intrusive and well designed so the customer enjoys its purpose, not thinks it's spyware out of their control and they blow a gasket about it.
![](/skins/images/A1D0BAA23B8384B6C27823B24914EA6E/responsive_peak/images/icon_anonymous_message.png)