
johnksilverwood asked a question.
Does anyone have a best practice for reporting on Installations for minor versions of applications?
- For example, tracking installs of Tableau Desktop 2021.2.8 vs 2021.2.17
- Since Flexera rolls that up to the 2021.2 main version, the minor versions .8 & .17 don't get split out.
We could go into each evidence list one by one and track, but that is very cumbersome.
I see there is an ideas submission that suggests adding evidence to the report builder, but is not going to be added due to size of database (which makes sense).
Should I try:
1) adding a dummy app for just Tableau 2021.2.8 (and assigning that incremental evidence) - this is what Nicolas suggests in the Ideas. (However I am not sure if flexera's existing ARL supported 21.2.% wildcard evidence will mess with my results)
(assuming this might conflict with our existing installed apps data though)
2) is this something the "application transparency report" via the "detailed evidence" flag solves?
Thanks!
Hello @johnksilverwood ,
Indeed this report provides the "full recognition story" but focuses only on the applications that have been flagged (to avoid the billion of possible rows in the ImportedInstalledFileEvidence table for instance) and also to remediate a possible synchronization issue: let's say SCCM was imported at 8:00 AM and the next full inventory import and reconcile happens at 10:00 PM. The imported raw evidence (particularly newly installed applications) may not match the installed applications that may have not yet normalized based on the latest SCCM import.
You can add the flag by batches from the "all applications" screen that has the "Import Detailed Evidence" button.
If you prefer something more straight forward, are on premise and accept the risk of data de-synchronization, you can use the report published the the Community.
I hope it helps,
Nicolas