
pandedx12 asked a question.
we have to make flexnet operations SSL enabled and tomcat is showing expired default cert.
Flexera Status:
All Systems Operational
pandedx12 asked a question.
we have to make flexnet operations SSL enabled and tomcat is showing expired default cert.
Having an issue with our DEV instance attempting to connect to Db fnmscompliance when initiating webUI. The fnmscompliance Db doesn't exist on EITHER PRD or DEV DataBase Servers. PRD works fine. Why would DEV look for that Db to open the webUI? Where can I change it to be like PRD and/or would a copy of the PRD Db to DEV correct the issue?
Server Error in '/Suite' Application. Cannot open database "fnmscompliance" requested by the login. The login failed.

You might want to post this in the Flexnet Manager forum (https://community.flexera.com/s/topic/0TOPL0000004Lfl4AE/flexnet-manager-suite-onpremises). I don't work with FNMS much, but I was under the impression that the compliance DB was always necessary.. Perhaps prod has the compliance DB, but it is of a different name.
Having an issue with our DEV instance attempting to connect to Db fnmscompliance when initiating webUI. The fnmscompliance Db doesn't exist on EITHER PRD or DEV DataBase Servers. PRD works fine. Why would DEV look for that Db to open the webUI? Where can I change it to be like PRD and/or would a copy of the PRD Db to DEV correct the issue?
Server Error in '/Suite' Application. Cannot open database "fnmscompliance" requested by the login. The login failed

Simoney69 asked a question.
Hi , has anyone had any experience trying to get Trellix Core to reconcile with older products , like endpoint ?
I can’t get mine to make compliance , thank you .

@Simoney69​
Personally, I wouldn't expect Trellix' newer core (or other) licensing models to automatically grant entitlement rights to deploy older node-based products unless Trellix's product use rights, grant letter, SKU migration guide, or ordering documentation explicitly state backward-use (downgrade) rights. If you have confirmed that you have such backward coverage included license entitlement wise you will likely to have manually apply this to the license objects.
If you require further guidance from the forum members you may want to include more details about what you have tested.
Thanks,
John Sorensen
oqueck (Flexera Software) asked a question.
Hi,
when will FlexNet Manager Suite 2026 R1 On-Premises be released please?
Thanks & best regards,
-oq-

In recent past years, Flexera's practice has often been to publish a release around the middle of the year. However I am not aware of any publicly announced timeframe for the next FlexNet Manager Suite on-premises release at this point in time.

erwin-lindemann asked a question.
Working with our Flexera customers, we know that the FNMS 2026 R1 (on-prem) release is available for download since mid of last week. However, we still don see the downloads in the 'Product & LIcense Center'. FNMS 2026 R1 Release notes are available since July 1st, too.
When will this release become available for download for Flexera partners and all customers?

The FlexNet Manager Suite 2026 R1 release is now available to everybody who is entitled to it based on a current subscription or maintenance agreement.
The release may not be available automatically to some Flexera partners. If you are a Flexera partner and would like to request access to the release then you may need to reach out to your Flexera Partner Manager or Flexera Support to arrange that.

0_ilknur asked a question.
Hi @0_ilknur​ this is scheduled for 1st July, updates will be added to FNMS release documentation https://docs.flexera.com/fnms-releases/feature-list
Having an issue with our DEV instance attempting to connect to Db fnmscompliance when initiating webUI. The fnmscompliance Db doesn't exist on EITHER PRD or DEV DataBase Servers. PRD works fine. Why would DEV look for that Db to open the webUI? Where can I change it to be like PRD and/or would a copy of the PRD Db to DEV correct the issue?
Server Error in '/Suite' Application. Cannot open database "fnmscompliance" requested by the login. The login failed
we have to make flexnet operations SSL enabled and tomcat is showing expired default cert.
Subject: Request updated FNMS Docker Monitor binary built with Go 1.25.7+ (CVE‑2025‑68121)
Hello Team,
Our security scanner (Prisma Compute) detected that the FNMS Docker Monitor component:
C:\Program Files (x86)\ManageSoft\Container\fnms-docker-monitor.exe
is built with Go
crypto/tls
version 1.25.3, which is vulnerable to CVE‑2025‑68121.
According to the Go project, the vulnerability is fixed only in:
Can you please provide the latest FNMS Container Monitor / Inventory Agent installer or updated
fnms-docker-monitor.exe
built with Go 1.25.7 or later, so we can apply the remediation?
Hi everyone.
Is there a way to copy use rights from one license to another?
We have a license with tons of upgrade and downgrade rights like this one:
We need to create another license with the same rights and then add some additional restrictions.
Any idea how to avoid doing it manually? Perhaps duplicate the original license and then change it's name and other properties?
Some SQL query?
Thanks in advance,
Pawel
Hi, how is it possible to disable docker monitoring from installing by default?
I tried in setup.ini:
CmdLine=/l*v "%TEMP%\FlexNet Inventory Agent.msi.log" REMOVE=docker
But that only made ALL custom installation options as disabled in GUI installation.
Also is there a complete reference somewhere for setup.ini where we would see all potential command line options?
I was just hoping to find so more solid information regarding this. I was able to find this information:
IOJ-1927932 Agent, Inventory:
Invalid inventory directory exclusions using wildcards may cause high CPU usage and ndtrack process seg faults on UNIX-like operating systems
Please don't specify wildcard within the path set to configure include or exclude directory paths e.g. */oracle/*backup/
From this article - https://docs.flexera.com/FlexNetManagerSuite2020R2/EN/Status/Issues/UnresolvedIssues.htm
But I was hoping to be able to go back to my team with some more solid information.
We currently have 3 AIX machines that are currently AIX 7.2.5.208 TL05. The team has had ongoing issues with these machines for the past few years and high CPU usage. But we haven't had any other teams reporting the same sort of issues with AIX machines.
They have increased all different specs to do with the machines but still face the same issues. With even more CPU/virtual hardware that gets added the more resource's ndtrack just ends up using.
Is there any solid explanation I can give the team besides " using wildcards may cause high CPU usage and ndtrack process seg faults on UNIX-like operating systems"