Loading
Can we get detailed rationale for why the unaffected Snow products are unaffected?

Thank you for all your quick work on this topic!

 

My vulnerability team - in addition to confirming that our purchased products are not vulnerable to the Dec. 2021 log4j exploit - wants to also collect each vendor's rationale for why they are not vulnerable to the exploit. Example explanations include: product X uses log4j version y.y.y, which is not vulnerable; product X includes a vulnerable version of log4j, but through configuration log4j is disabled.

 

Can you provide this detail for each of your non-vulnerable products? Thank you again for your time!


  • Jorge Ortiz (Flexera Software)

    Jonathan,

     

    I am happy to say that all of the Snow License Manager products are unaffected by the Log4J exploit as we do not utilize this within our application. Snow Commander is a completely different product not stemming from Snow License Manager which is why we announced the problem and resolution. This is covered in https://community.flexera.com/s/article/Vulnerability-in-Log4j-CVE-2021-45105

     

    If you have any additional questions/concerns feel free to respond or open a support ticket with the Snow team.

     

    Kind Regards,

     

    Gabe Ortiz

    Snow Software Inc

    Expand Post

Related  Product Forums


                     â†’ Flexera One



                      â†’ Snow Atlas



                      â†’ FlexNet Manager



                      â†’ Snow License Manager



                       â†’ App Broker


       Need help finding an answer?


        Ask a Question →


Loading
Can we get detailed rationale for why the unaffected Snow products are unaffected?