This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- Revenera Community
- :
- InstallAnywhere
- :
- InstallAnywhere Forum
- :
- Getting No JVM error while running IA Installer
Subscribe
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Nov 21, 2007
11:25 AM
Getting No JVM error while running IA Installer
Hi,
I created IA (2008) Installer for Linux (RedHAT Enterprise) and I am trying to run the install.bin file on Linux machine. But I am getting following error
"No java Virtual Machine could be found from your PATH environment variable. you must Install a VM prior to running this program
Note: My Linux machine is already Installed with JRE 1.4.2
Please let me know the answer if any one have the idea on this.
Regards,
Ajaykumar
I created IA (2008) Installer for Linux (RedHAT Enterprise) and I am trying to run the install.bin file on Linux machine. But I am getting following error
"No java Virtual Machine could be found from your PATH environment variable. you must Install a VM prior to running this program
Note: My Linux machine is already Installed with JRE 1.4.2
Please let me know the answer if any one have the idea on this.
Regards,
Ajaykumar
(7) Replies
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Nov 21, 2007
11:52 AM
Most likely one of the followings has happened:
1) Either your installed JVM is not in the system's PATH
or
2) The installed JVM is in the system's PATH, but you have defined a minimum Java version needed by your installer to run and this version is higher than 1.4.2
Before launching the installer issue this command
export LAX_DEBUG=true
then launch your installer like this:
sh -x install.bin
and you should get a maximum of output that'll show you better what exactly is the system's PATH, what the installer has found etc.
1) Either your installed JVM is not in the system's PATH
or
2) The installed JVM is in the system's PATH, but you have defined a minimum Java version needed by your installer to run and this version is higher than 1.4.2
Before launching the installer issue this command
export LAX_DEBUG=true
then launch your installer like this:
sh -x install.bin
and you should get a maximum of output that'll show you better what exactly is the system's PATH, what the installer has found etc.
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Jun 05, 2008
03:24 PM
I don't want to require my users to have java in their path. We require root access to install, and often the root user has a limited path which may not include optional stuff like java. So I said to bundle the VM, but even though it prints info about extracting the VM, it still can't find the thing it just unpacked! I set LAX_DEBUG to get it to print lots of info, including where it's looking, and indeed it's not looking anywhere except $PATH. Now, there's a sad looking message, "checking: "" against "1.4+": failed (wrong version)", which is strange, because the packed VM is 1.5.0_11, which I downloaded from the site.
Any ideas? For now we're in development, and I can require the user to have java in their path, but I must solve this in a couple months when our final ship is.
Any ideas? For now we're in development, and I can require the user to have java in their path, but I must solve this in a couple months when our final ship is.
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Jun 06, 2008
03:41 AM
What is your IA version?
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Jun 06, 2008
03:45 PM
I am using IA 2008 VP1 freshly downloaded like a week ago when the purchase order was completed.
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Jun 07, 2008
02:47 AM
And you were installing on Linux right? What distribution, what version?
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Jun 08, 2008
12:33 PM
We are using some fairly elderly form of redhat. I am so confused by linux versioning and how to tell what I have installed! uname -a produces
Linux pluto 2.4.19-4GB #1 Mon Oct 21 18:45:41 UTC 2002 i686 unknown
Linux pluto 2.4.19-4GB #1 Mon Oct 21 18:45:41 UTC 2002 i686 unknown
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎Jun 09, 2008
12:33 PM
It turned out the VM I had downloaded and selected for my linux installation was for AMD-64, not for Intel 32. All is improved now.