This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- Revenera Community
- :
- FlexNet Publisher
- :
- FlexNet Publisher Knowledge Base
- :
- -served and -borrow local activation (appactutil) options comparison
Subscribe
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content
-served and -borrow local activation (appactutil) options comparison
-served and -borrow local activation (appactutil) options comparison
- Activation with -borrow model can be replaced with -served model. There is no fundamental difference between these two.
- Activation with -borrow was introduced to showcase that borrow functionality provided on certificate side can also reached with Trusted storage. Considering the advantage that borrow information will be stored on more secured location.
To give similar behavior, - It is expected that while using -borrow we should only have hybrid count. License server will able to track the count.
- Borrow activation applies to license server and not applicable for back office.
- For introducing the TS borrow support in FlexEnabled application, code base is quite simplified compared to classic activation.
No ratings