This website uses cookies. By clicking Accept, you consent to the use of cookies. Click Here to learn more about how we use cookies.
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- Flexera Community
- :
- FlexNet Manager
- :
- FlexNet Manager Forum
- :
- What security have users placed around the ManageSoftRET$ and mgsRET$ network shares ?
Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 24, 2019
09:15 AM
Hi,
We have heard that a number of companies security teams have added extra security around the network shares ManageSoftRET$ and mgsRET$ . We are not of the opinion that this is strictly necessary. In order to improve our understanding can I ask the user group, if you do add anything to the standard build, can you tell us what you do about these shares ?
1 Solution
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 26, 2019
12:30 PM
The "default" entry for this is "Everyone" AND "Anonymous Logon" with "Read-only". Since the typical use case is utilizing a Discovery and Inventory Task to target Remote Devices for Adoption or FlexNet Inventory utilized by Windows Machines - there are 2 common scenarios.
1) If this methodology isn't utilized, some customers remove the share
2) If it is utilized, it is common to change the security to remove Anonymous Logon at a minimum - and occasionally Everyone and only allow "Authenticated Users" - forcing that an actual Domain login occur.
This thread has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
To continue the discussion, please start a new thread.
3 Replies
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 26, 2019
12:30 PM
The "default" entry for this is "Everyone" AND "Anonymous Logon" with "Read-only". Since the typical use case is utilizing a Discovery and Inventory Task to target Remote Devices for Adoption or FlexNet Inventory utilized by Windows Machines - there are 2 common scenarios.
1) If this methodology isn't utilized, some customers remove the share
2) If it is utilized, it is common to change the security to remove Anonymous Logon at a minimum - and occasionally Everyone and only allow "Authenticated Users" - forcing that an actual Domain login occur.
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 27, 2019
12:05 AM
@DAWN - Do you have any insight into the type of threat or attack that people are trying to guard against by removing the shares or requiring authentication to access them?
(Did my reply solve the question? Click "ACCEPT AS SOLUTION" to help others find answers faster. Liked something? Click "KUDO". Anything expressed here is my own view and not necessarily that of my employer, Flexera.)
- Mark as New
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apr 29, 2019
08:36 AM
Typically, this is reducing the ability of a hacker to push some sort of executable file that could be accessed through any user login to elevate privs. Readonly is good - but you usually don't want to allow anonymous login to the Windows Shares unless absolutely necessary.
This would be a multi-prong attack scenario - but you want to close every avenue of access that's not needed. Or at least reduce the users that can have any access to that share. It's a typical sysadmin hardening task to ensure least privs.
